| 翻訳と辞書 |
| United States v. Matlock ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
United States v. Matlock
''United States v. Matlock'', 415 U.S. 164 (1974) was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures was not violated when the police obtained voluntary consent from a third party who possessed common authority over the premises sought to be searched. The ruling of the court established the "co-occupant consent rule," which was later explained by ''Illinois v. Rodriguez'', 497 U.S. 177 (1990) and distinguished later by ''Georgia v. Randolph'' (2006), in which the court held that a third party could not consent over the objections of a present co-occupant, and ''Fernandez v. California'' (2014), where the court held when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.
==References==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「United States v. Matlock」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|